Communism Means Wife-Swapping

Don’t take it from me, take it from Marx and Engels.

Take it away, boys:

But you Communists would introduce community of women, screams the bourgeoisie in chorus.

The bourgeois sees his wife a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women.

He has not even a suspicion that the real point aimed at is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production.

For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce community of women; it has existed almost from time immemorial.

Our bourgeois, not content with having wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other’s wives.

Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of the community of women springing from that system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private.

(Communist Manifesto)

So they justify their desire for hot steamy promiscuous orgies by claiming a TU QUOQUE: saying, the bourgeouis (french for citizen. The class of people communists wipe out where they can.) have done it as well.

Of course a TU QUOQUE is *NOT* a defense or a logical argument but an ADMISSION OF GUILT – a “You did it too! (so, yes, I did do it.)”; and a sophist technique.

Who else wanted wife-swapping before Marx and Engels?

Jacob Frank (also Jew)

Founder of Frankism, the inversion of the 10 commandments to bring about absolute evil, forcing Jahwe into appearing to fix things. Jacob Frank amassed a huge following and made it to his own castle and private army in Offenbach near Frankfurt – where Mayer Amschel Rothschild was doing his thing at the same time – being 20 years younger than Jacob Frank.

Was Rothschild a disciple of Jacob Frank, i.e. a Frankist? Highly likely. It’s a stone’s throw from Frankfurt to Offenbach.

Destruction of the family is a social engineering technique for the creation of the Total State invented by Plato and described in his Politeia (The Republic)

Modern jewish social engineers like Marcuse, promoter of the sexual revolution, employ this technique. Why are Jews like Marx, Frank, Marcuse constantly recurring here? Because they historically don’t have a state and want to create one. And as Judaism itself is an application of Plato’s social engineering technique, they are experts in it.

What? Judaism was engineered using Plato’s ideas? Yes. In 250 BC. h/t to Lars:

SRN – Interview with Russell Gmirkin: What Does Plato Have To Do With the Bible?

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s