On suyts I answered a comment by a friendly atheist (no really; he’s a nice guy with a live and let live attitude) that I need to elevate to a post here.
So all ye believers in evolution, hear me out. I’m a creationist at this point in time, logic leaves me no other choice.
May 17, 2016 at 3:35 am
” Now I am pretty much the same, I am a conservative non believer and against this AGW crap because it doesn’t add up except for government taxes yet again and it doesn’t solve anything in the end. And then when I look at religion it was the same.”
My answer: Too many defects
Well different people get different information and come to different conclusions. I was pretty much a Christian AND a believer in Darwinian evolution (because, why shouldn’t God create the conditions for an evolutionary process); over time I found out the holes in Darwinian (or Neo-Darwinian, which is Darwin with genes) evolution, so now it’s pretty clear to me that I was being hoodwinked. As evolution cannot work given the constraints found in reality, a totally different outlook emerges (hint: it must be a spiritual one). Evolution – while a nice idea – is proven wrong – the evolutionists don’t even try to defend it – because the numbers show it can’t work (*)- so the evolutionists at this point in time just proclaim “We have won, you religious people are nutters” (their only argument being that God does not make a measurement device react).
Think about it. When is the last time you heard Dawkins calculate the probability of positive mutations? I give you a hint. NEVER. It is not a science – it is polemic from start to finish.
(*) Every human germ cell contains about 30 negative mutations. Every child inherits about 60 defects from sperm cell and egg cell. Natural selection would have to kill off *ALL* children to maintain the quality of the genome even BEFORE any positive mutation could occur. In spite of this, evolutionists claim that magically a positive development takes place. At this point in time, the theory must be called rejected.
Origin Of Life
Same for origin of life – I think they have given up entirely even researching it. When was the last time you heard about a new idea there in the news? 20 years ago? Wouldn’t such ideas be newsworthy even given the stupidity of most journalists?
So, the evolutionists behave *EXACTLY* like the warmunists: Stonewalling and defending a refuted theory.
The “Modern” State
Evolution of course is the FOUNDATION for the “a human is just a walking lump of meat”-atheism on which the modern socialist state builds – as the human is made from dead matter only, he can be shaped by the Total State into any form the state likes. I include the imperial USA (from 1898 on) just as the USSR and the EU – mostly a CIA creation – in this.
A key milestone in the Atheist world revolution was Wundt, the founder of behaviorism, at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, which was rechristened Max Planck Institute in the BRD. He was the teacher of Pavlow. At that time, Americans came to Germany to make their PhD – the PhD being a Prussian invention – later introduced in the USA.
Behaviorism is basically bankrupt but the repercussions refuse to go away for now.
If evolution cannot work, DEVOLUTION sure can – and it is what one would expect given the genetic defect accumulation; and the general tendency of the universe to become more entropic.
BUT this totally changes the outlook: Instead of an automatic development to higher and higher perfection, we face inevitable downfall. In this view, the clock is ticking, time is running out, not by Global Warming, but through extinction (and extinction is what we observe – have the animals that go extinct simply lost their viability? Look at the reproduction rates of some of them. Is it any wonder they go extinct?)
(I could also mention the white race right here)
This very real problem is entirely ignored by the Atheist world leaders. They say that diversity will save the day. But the imported populations have a lower IQ than we; they cannot replace us and our civilisation is doomed (if current trends continue).
It looks like we are creating more and more tecnology to escape our own extermination. Maybe it’ll work. Maybe the Technological Singularity (von Neumann, Ray Kurzweil, Vernor Vinge) saves the day and becomes our rapture. Is this what was prophecied? So – does atheism meet its master (and maker)?
What have YOU to say?
Don’t hesitate to contribute your opinion. I can take it. I’m not angry if you call me a nutter – as I said, logic leaves me no other conclusion at this point in time. And I’m just posting this as my ranting answer is not the first time I wrote it all down so let’s preserve this so I save the time the next time.